Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 22.06.2025 00:39

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Here Are the 2025 BET Awards Winners: Full List - Billboard
Thank you.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
How do you get a teenage boy to care about hygiene?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What’s next?
Europe stock markets open lower; FTSE 100 choppy after UK economy shrinks more than expected - CNBC
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
New Webb Data Confirms ‘Crazy Idea’ About Cooling Effects of Pluto’s Haze - The Daily Galaxy
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Discovery of a Lifetime: Student Discovers Ancient “Living Fossil” Underneath Rock - SciTechDaily
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
The closer a volcano is to erupting, the greener the trees around it look from space - Live Science